CREATE TABLE
<< CREATE SEQUENCE | FB 2.0 Language Reference | CREATE TRIGGER >>
CREATE TABLE
CHECK
accepts NULL
outcome
Changed in: 2.0
Description
If a CHECK
constraint resolves to NULL
, Firebird versions before 2.0 reject the input. Following the SQL standard to the letter, Firebird 2.0 and above let NULL
s pass and only consider the check failed if the outcome is false.
Example
Checks like these:
check (value > 10000) check (Town like 'Amst%') check (upper(value) in ( 'A', 'B', 'X' )) check (Minimum <= Maximum)
all fail in pre-2.0 Firebird versions if the value to be checked is NULL
. In 2.0 and above they succeed.
Warning: This change may cause existing databases to behave differently when migrated to Firebird 2.0+. Carefully examine your CREATE
/ALTER TABLE
statements and add and XXX is not null
predicates to your CHECK
s if they should continue to reject NULL
input.
Context variables as column defaults
Changed in: IB
Description
Any context variable that is assignment-compatible to the column datatype can be used as a default. This was already the case in InterBase 6, but the Language Reference only mentioned USER
.
Example
create table MyData ( id int not null primary key, record_created timestamp default current_timestamp, ... )
FOREIGN KEY
without target column references PK
Changed in: IB
Description
If you create a foreign key without specifying a target column, it will reference the primary key of the target table. This was already the case in InterBase 6, but the IB Language Reference wrongly states that in such cases, the engine scans the target table for a column with the same name as the referencing column.
Example
create table eik ( a int not null primary key, b int not null unique ); create table beuk ( b int references eik ); -- beuk.b references eik.a, not eik.b !
FOREIGN KEY
creation no longer requires exclusive access
Changed in: 2.0
Description
In Firebird 2.0 and above, creating a foreign key constraint no longer requires exclusive access to the database.
UNIQUE
constraints now allow NULL
s
Changed in: 1.5
Description
In compliance with the SQL-99 standard, NULL
s – even multiple – are now allowed in columns with a UNIQUE
constraint. It is therefore possible to define a UNIQUE
key on a column that has no NOT NULL
constraint.
For UNIQUE
keys that span multiple columns, the logic is a little complicated:
- Multiple rows having all the
UK
columnsNULL
are allowed. - Multiple rows having a different subset of
UK
columsNULL
are allowed. - Multiple rows having the same subset of
UK
columnsNULL
and the rest filled with regular values and those regular values differ in at least one column, are allowed. - Multiple rows having the same subset of
UK
columnsNULL
and the rest filled with regular values and those regular values are the same in every column, are forbidden.
One way of summarizing this is as follows: In principle, all NULL
s are considered distinct. But if two rows have exactly the same subset of UK
columns filled with non-NULL
values, the NULL
columns are ignored and the non-NULL
columns are decisive, just as if they constituted the entire unique key.
USING INDEX
subclause
Available in: DSQL
Added in: 1.5
Description
A USING INDEX
subclause can be placed at the end of a primary, unique or foreign key definition.
Its purpose is to
- provide a user-defined name for the automatically created index that enforces the constraint, and
- optionally define the index to be ascending or descending (the default being ascending).
Without USING INDEX
, indices enforcing named constraints are named after the constraint (this is new behaviour in Firebird 1.5) and indices for unnamed constraints get names like RDB$FOREIGN13
or something equally romantic.
Note: You must always provide a new name for the index. It is not possible to use existing indices to enforce constraints.
USING INDEX
can be applied at field level, at table level, and (in ALTER TABLE
) with ADD CONSTRAINT
. It works with named as well as unnamed key constraints. It does not work with CHECK
constraints, as these don't have their own enforcing index.
Syntax
[CONSTRAINT constraint-name] <constraint-type> <constraint-definition> [USING [ASC[ENDING] | DESC[ENDING]] INDEX index_name]
Examples
The first example creates a primary key constraint PK_CUST
using an index named IX_CUSTNO
:
create table customers ( custno int not null constraint pk_cust primary key using index ix_custno, ...
This, however:
create table customers ( custno int not null primary key using index ix_custno, ...
...will give you a PK constraint called INTEG_7
or something similar, and an index IX_CUSTNO
.
Some more examples:
create table people ( id int not null, nickname varchar(12) not null, country char(4), .. .. constraint pk_people primary key (id), constraint uk_nickname unique (nickname) using index ix_nick ) alter table people add constraint fk_people_country foreign key (country) references countries(code) using desc index ix_people_country
Important: If you define a descending constraint-enforcing index on a primary or unique key, be sure to make any foreign keys referencing it descending as well.
See also:
CREATE DOMAIN
ALTER TABLE
GRANT
REVOKE
Keys
DDL - Data Definition Language
SQL2003 compliant alternative for computed fields
back to top of page
<< CREATE SEQUENCE | FB 2.0 Language Reference | CREATE TRIGGER >>